From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 49DA43858D28; Mon, 8 May 2023 17:43:23 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 49DA43858D28 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1683567803; bh=CG09LFvFRZruFEPagnuX9ZrURr1SdZ3cOQj/IqLdH98=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=MtwbaNvk9U3TiwF1Nka8t0KQ69osdnisoo/jmrDRm2g1+Tr5FccR+w1EKUPoMOPmp mviKVTK+Ghsjz6XDPfAOpHzQkzuNI47SNqgTZPgOmzxL8yXSHt1DFKHazR4/F3AtCU NIj/iDxriAxNNhNmzJLbJqDDuAuk6MVwL2AssmGw= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug testsuite/109776] [14 Regression] pr81192 fails on some targets after recent propagator changes Date: Mon, 08 May 2023 17:43:23 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109776 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot = gnu.org --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > The issue is xstormy has a 16bit int type and both 1 and 0 are getting > assigned > 'int'. >=20 > Since you #define int you need to wrap all literals with _Literal (int) .= .. > and of course 2147483647 won't fit (thus dg-require-effective-target > int32plus?) Oh I missed the define for some reason when I was looking into the tests to= day. Let me try to fix it for 16bit int targets.=