From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id B42073857701; Wed,  7 Jun 2023 22:28:44 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B42073857701
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1686176924;
	bh=GTl8q1AitZIjAbBYq86fOdamtgoV4Xw/3PfrQdT7EBM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Pmif3ejh/uSHWhA+wNNRIcpeKsWMz9hk/EH5f3UPD/5UsWMs/gjha1OAhPqwfksN0
	 TipHmU+/XyszlZZ2hbZGjoDHK58z+Gghz15xO/6iJWnBWwpLD5rqhaUqtW1m8Zbgka
	 +kKluIl7GzoC88F4+2T+AsnjZ7y0BMYUgIVCzwKY=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/109791] -Wstringop-overflow warning with -O3
 and _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2023 22:28:43 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109791-4-woiodnates@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109791-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109791-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109791

--- Comment #17 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #16)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #15)
> > Created attachment 55155 [details]
> > patch unfolding such PHIs
> >=20
> > Updated PHI unfolding patch.  Tests fine besides mentioned diagnostic
> > regressions.
>=20
> I was looking into doing the opposite in forwprop but maybe I can skip
> addresses.

Oh yes I see it was mentioned before in PR 102138.=