From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 90F9C3858D33; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 07:23:32 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 90F9C3858D33
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1708500212;
	bh=QHLyNAlq67ASMQWL1ZO1jL+Da1aTEYPB819AgLungmU=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Gy3XFWPyR6BlmlDOqYk+A/PHQ2OPXWBImCdOH/8wa9hdJ8XBg+qFPrhztlmCEELdQ
	 ioWGDH1vMOaOKtE6aVGoMX5hMcd6rfdllqGQ9ezeYKYaUo4npu8v/FcLIjS/a2pNce
	 QlrSKt6GfgayAIsVwW6Lre4GYANIjQv8H7buBda8=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/109804] [11/12/13/14 Regression] internal
 compiler error in gimple-ssa-warn-access.cc
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 07:23:32 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to
Message-ID: <bug-109804-4-34t3VMfwbI@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109804-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109804-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109804

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |pinskia at gcc dot =
gnu.org

--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #9)
> Right.  Local unnamed enums are of the DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_UNNAMED_TYPE ty=
pe,
> but those don't have their subtrees filed as per
> cplus_demangle_fill_component.  So I think we can't do *newc.u.s_binary.l=
eft
> when the type is DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_UNNAMED_TYPE.  Maybe they need a new
> case in new_delete_mismatch_p.

      ret->type =3D DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_UNNAMED_TYPE;
      ret->u.s_number.number =3D num;


Yes and we just need to compare the number.
Let me add that and test it.=