public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug debug/109805] LTO affecting -fdebug-prefix-map Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 06:34:30 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-109805-4-n7LVhIxWw5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-109805-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109805 Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Sergio Durigan Junior from comment #9) > at(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8) > > This works for me. The consistency check is not fully implemented and > > instead > > of passing down no -fdebug-prefix-map the patch passes the first but warns: > > > > > ./xgcc -B. t.o t2.o -o t > > lto-wrapper: warning: option > > -fdebug-prefix-map=/home/rguenther/obj-trunk-g/gcc=/bbb with different > > values, using /home/rguenther/obj-trunk-g/gcc=/aaa > > > > to make consistency checking work we need to record -fcanon-prefix-map > > and the full set of -f{file,debug}-prefix-map options in order (I think > > file and debug variants can be considered the same) of the first TU and > > compare that to each of the following TUs. > > Thanks a lot for the patch. I tried it locally, and it indeed works for the > simple example I posted in the description of this bug. However, for some > reason it doesn't seem to make a difference for the vim compilation. I'm > still seeing a directory table like the following: > > Directory table: > [path(line_strp)] > 0 /home/ubuntu/vim/vim-9.0.1378/src/vim-basic (0) > 1 /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits (57) > 2 /usr/include (92) > > whereas if I pass -fdebug-prefix-map to LDFLAGS, the directory table becomes: > > Directory table: > [path(line_strp)] > 0 /usr/src/vim-2:9.0.1378-2ubuntu2~ppa1/src/vim-basic (0) > 1 /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits (65) > 2 /usr/include (100) > > which is what I expected to see. Odd. > > Note a link-time specified option will simply ignore all options from the > > compile-time (but only for the link-time unit, the compile-time debug info > > has already been generated with the originally specified options). > > FWIW, I think this bug is related to #108534 (and the related discussion at > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/606205.html). Yes, that looks related. Note we do remap the file part of locations but indeed not the streamed PWD. When I remap PWD as well I get The Directory Table (offset 0x10a, lines 2, columns 1): Entry Name 0 (indirect line string, offset: 0x18): /aaa 1 (indirect line string, offset: 0xd): ../../../../aaa The File Name Table (offset 0x118, lines 2, columns 2): Entry Dir Name 0 0 (indirect line string, offset: 0x0): <artificial> 1 1 (indirect line string, offset: 0x1d): t.c for the toy example. That's quite odd, but possibly the behavior of the original intent of the patch you quoted - but it also shows that the remapping of the streamed PWD is likely wrong? For the record the above is with just diff --git a/gcc/lto-streamer-out.cc b/gcc/lto-streamer-out.cc index 0bca530313c..89b602f080b 100644 --- a/gcc/lto-streamer-out.cc +++ b/gcc/lto-streamer-out.cc @@ -231,7 +231,8 @@ lto_output_location_1 (struct output_block *ob, struct bitpack_d *bp, } bp_pack_value (bp, stream_pwd, 1); if (stream_pwd) - bp_pack_string (ob, bp, get_src_pwd (), true); + bp_pack_string (ob, bp, remap_debug_filename (get_src_pwd ()), + true); bp_pack_string (ob, bp, remapped, true); bp_pack_value (bp, xloc.sysp, 1); } r10-6887-gd12153046816f9 did the original bits of remapping and shows we originally passed through the remapping options. r11-3096-g3d0af0c997fe42 was Jakubs fix for .debug_line and relative paths vs. changing CWD.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-15 6:34 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-05-11 0:48 [Bug debug/109805] New: " sergiodj at sergiodj dot net 2023-05-11 0:52 ` [Bug debug/109805] " sergiodj at sergiodj dot net 2023-05-11 2:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-05-11 2:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-05-11 6:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-05-11 14:36 ` sergiodj at sergiodj dot net 2023-05-11 14:38 ` sergiodj at sergiodj dot net 2023-05-12 7:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-05-12 12:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-05-12 12:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-05-13 19:21 ` sergiodj at sergiodj dot net 2023-05-15 6:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2023-05-15 9:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-05-16 22:25 ` sergiodj at sergiodj dot net 2023-05-17 7:23 ` rguenther at suse dot de
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-109805-4-n7LVhIxWw5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).