From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 23E743858C5F; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 11:30:46 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 23E743858C5F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1705059046;
	bh=6wdbwmc3Jde1TVw4cDQyBEUXw+TaC4iUvT0uB9UEzes=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=XZWQKc1IcbleBtg+Kobnbj7FAegH/SeDQmFnhdK0z8zqs399kbBnOM5/F5Dio4l1X
	 1rC/7VFsrHAPMpX7cBnPJqLcA6XmiWXp0rk8AVoCmR7vUOYwBSeMtsMqx5vf9OoDzg
	 TAo1W4yGo1U4iXytOvWpOcwQQeX5bYbQfaKx3+rc=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/109806] [13/14 Regression] 13.1.0 cc1plus
 stack smashing crash with C array of complex structs
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 11:30:44 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, memory-hog
X-Bugzilla-Severity: critical
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-109806-4-06chTJ1YwU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109806-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109806-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109806

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |WAITING

--- Comment #18 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Note ranger memory usage should be significantly lower now, the relevant ch=
ange
was also backported to the GCC 13 branch, but after 13.2 was released so on=
ly
for GCC 13.3.

Can the original reporter please check with a GCC 13 build from after Sep 26
(r13-7841-g70639014a69cf5)?=