From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 8767E3858C27; Sat, 13 May 2023 10:50:31 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8767E3858C27
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1683975031;
	bh=iN8Xl6HIUQ8Eej7DwqxEIIdrRndSpO19s0f8Qcv5zTY=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Nbq15TnSTEj9x1vrFDtoHwke9n+lYjbVOCMl/Op4Q65zhkdAMEy9AcbDQW+qWfl+U
	 gZdcNYzePpv3zghjdbf5B8HrtN2Ggr6qOu/+w/x1CjSm2JmGy8ackkOPqxh4irFr1u
	 4lt/o6uqjKI1HMPTEfCh3mlvMcvczeOFXXNJvL9U=
From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/109807] [14 Regression] sse2-mmx-pmaddwd.c met ICE after
 commit r14-666-g608e7f3ab47 with march=cascadelake
Date: Sat, 13 May 2023 10:50:31 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ubizjak at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109807-4-E7Mtx7wy5u@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109807-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109807-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109807

--- Comment #11 from Uro=C5=A1 Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #10)
> (In reply to Uro=C5=A1 Bizjak from comment #8)
> > Fixed.
>=20
> I don't think so. The code I gave seems still to crash the compiler:

Yes, the cost function is ICEing on unhandled modes (that is *not* a good
approach). Please look at the PR109825 how it will be solved.=