From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 07B8B3858C54; Thu, 11 May 2023 08:44:37 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 07B8B3858C54 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1683794678; bh=0qBYVsr4m34Iqcv3Ddu5uhk9aRrtAxNAwgW2xIxnHwo=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=jy+9OzA5W65mamzNtxa61ObKXjjYEF6XryTI8qLvhY74+GAVEOq8xi878brIgnZhA mcibzPzbHN76MNwNklt0FNg1F4Q10xMixaP2eOYChK5p6fFY+8tv/Bs/lHsyVOkypg 57zETeId63DMgRKlimrXkgH2Z1c0ncyF5Q+hZwhg= From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/109808] [12 regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print as with _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI 0 Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 08:44:37 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109808 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Is this really a 12 regression? I think it's failed that way for some time = when using the old ABI, it's just that nobody except me tests it that way :-) I think it was fixed on trunk by r13-4080-g2b7f0378b915a6 and backported as r12-9301-g0970eafdc61d75=