From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id B643A3858D32; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 23:23:57 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B643A3858D32
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1700868237;
	bh=LCVkUlQefnuKRfRYlyy+Aw6GInDOt5pvexPO3p/UEog=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=pLSvd+haIUy0dUb5xFuke3LDnbnTWj4WdiPBXt4IURJqXofLhuthCcZhv3VT92bhg
	 OlXMT7RvNALXKsZo4QvwvL9xo8Z3w3or2LzO0rxYajnJt1MyPfqHOGJmfcSMYIaaYv
	 lp7+b4m7ymg9LYoj+lvburfgYATo3wr8EzVH6ERw=
From: "sjames at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/109811] libjxl 0.7 is a lot slower in GCC 13.1 vs Clang
 16
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 23:23:57 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109811-4-BOEnVhDuj5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109811-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109811-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109811

--- Comment #16 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Thank you all for the effort.=