From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 4A8E2385840F; Sat, 25 Nov 2023 06:22:15 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4A8E2385840F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1700893335;
	bh=P+2V4o0go5a25OTORMsmrrscjrfLWwcKWrmEdNLjQnY=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=sFDexi1uGufFFE9U1vw0ReZB350txmr5PGPxdGjYiwif10HgesOFUawcOYxiwO/pQ
	 BeOfKyI0rxqnAQI9a96hfWuWhfP2fsdQwJhhPkKoIgVRgPJp10nmHLfAY7k54aR4xU
	 dEE1YAiD2VJqKjxYwdCt/BeyidXs1O9dr/XNkisc=
From: "aros at gmx dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/109811] libjxl 0.7 is a lot slower in GCC 13.1 vs Clang
 16
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2023 06:22:12 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: aros at gmx dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109811-4-qaVBUuEKXU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109811-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109811-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109811

--- Comment #17 from Artem S. Tashkinov <aros at gmx dot com> ---
Terrific results, thanks a ton!

Maybe this bug report could be closed now?=