From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 983603858C78; Fri, 12 May 2023 07:59:49 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 983603858C78 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1683878389; bh=o4Polc1G7CK6U+CwbVev/wkU64Iw+D5TJBKvnMgv8qs=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=yv0pDUfbBn5UWRHw4VaVSYZw4J8Y2u0q+isiQHmOBD0uSkYxrqOTXVxnl3uvRitgc AccnwXVx8Z0Wg4oK1eThLN6bgO9XCuxkf3yWJ6pAr0c21CfAyPonKZZb0GoBMN/JaD rim9nRdWxTi/BWkMyb+TQqjN3lYaZL8zejJ8su2Q= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/109823] [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE with trailing return of decltype of a fold expression in nested generic variadic lambda Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 07:59:49 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone cf_known_to_work short_desc cf_known_to_fail Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109823 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|--- |10.5 Known to work| |7.5.0 Summary|ICE with trailing return of |[10/11/12/13/14 Regression] |decltype of a fold |ICE with trailing return of |expression in nested |decltype of a fold |generic variadic lambda |expression in nested | |generic variadic lambda Known to fail| |8.1.0 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- My testcase is a regression from GCC 7.5.0.=