From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 2778F3857BB2; Mon, 15 May 2023 16:30:36 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2778F3857BB2
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1684168236;
	bh=H9uFxCHz6HBlm1zZzSBLdLXQGQWvAo8GLlzVr+SGIVQ=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=TuqlmQZxLBHlujSQSBZhudKGTzRt8ZDozZ9s4o4a6h03jXUYbDh3ybKLqMtjXqCtE
	 +yrUnriMqMCNSkju7CfcesqRBvhprtE+qousB8Xs4RK4rw/EA4w+LvlPxsOlKt1jYz
	 eHykBPQs4U3Z68eCnVm1bklykCzKQR04CzfAdDEE=
From: "yann at droneaud dot fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/109828] [13/14 Regression] static compound literal with
 flexible array in initializer leads to invalid size and ICE
Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 16:30:36 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid, assemble-failure, ice-checking,
 ice-on-invalid-code, needs-bisection
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: yann at droneaud dot fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.2
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109828-4-roFUr9ogbx@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109828-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109828-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109828

--- Comment #8 from Yann Droneaud <yann at droneaud dot fr> ---
(In reply to Yann Droneaud from comment #7)
> I've also experimented compound literal initialization at block level
> instead of file level. Except in case it's not supported, it shows the sa=
me
> issue at block level as file level.
>=20
> https://godbolt.org/z/vn5Pn7hTx
>=20
> Unrelated, I've noted it's not possible to initialize the flexible array =
if
> the initializer is not having a static storage. I would have expected this
> restriction to be lifted by now.

I've opened bug #109863=