From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 594793858416; Sat, 13 May 2023 22:56:08 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 594793858416 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1684018568; bh=zDEy3u4QkyYg9gskOteCiaac+Rt/tKrQIIET21s5VNw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=JGF1TGUZC436nLYV0aokCnb2hvISgXbBXe/hvpSu2pjmiZVIT5K1krU8girwSMSea 9Ut3Uvv11cWTIfGlpM/oM/iFwEuk+FPtMCqWaltLPIopYXlsgUrM7HaS2gOyVrNpWx XEj/qTu+Ipjs6mkIFVdSZqv/Devnj+NAkN/dkTzU= From: "sjames at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/109835] -Wincompatible-function-pointer-types as a subset of -Wincompatible-pointer-types? Date: Sat, 13 May 2023 22:56:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: sjames at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109835 --- Comment #4 from Sam James --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #3) > I thought that there was already a separate bug for this, but it turns out > that I was thinking of bug 87379, which is for something different... Good catch. I think that'd actually address some (not all, ofc) of the conc= erns I have about these.=