From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 343DE3858C52; Sat, 13 May 2023 22:29:09 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 343DE3858C52
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1684016949;
	bh=0YQ+p1e1yWrVJaL109TC+k074Uvk617wuTQnAQmgWAs=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=G24YkSyBfco4ikbJ8QiCwQpenNibEokcYbEa16k/WOYqwHbsAQhxbSOl7eGzuq/S3
	 z8O6I7F+nJZatvJ65k84NCKHdomAVlFLrNgSXJBvrb10/aZfLejqapQ6AOQSIfdhh3
	 F9DJBgwvucOW+sYVw+L4WbN/gKOPICj4V+kXRIbA=
From: "neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/109846] [rejects valid] Pointer-valued function
 reference rejected as actual argument
Date: Sat, 13 May 2023 22:29:09 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109846-4-sDplsMokog@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109846-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109846-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109846

--- Comment #2 from Neil Carlson <neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com> ---
Amusing! I have a regression in 13.1 (which I need to create a reproducer f=
or)
where the workaround for a segfault is to use a RESULT variable -- just the
opposite :-)=