From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 34631385840D; Sat, 13 May 2023 22:32:55 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 34631385840D
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1684017175;
	bh=CvnxoIz8flIzJl7sugVOU+0IQhx7CAWUUNr6Y0S8erk=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=TT90lQSyUG+TpeK/tDT68fzyuhjZlutrqVC46w/AuJgw6BdSfi7yp3eM8/clNiOJv
	 Ww1wH5Xka/NAxYyqlYN7SNQaocTssbmpvzu5IVenHFGziq0bo6x7cjSHqhkit+9Wv+
	 DQQvoPKmWLkxoAQ+Y/Fk5l1L2Di9Ix4H78ln7XkQ=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/109849] suboptimal code for vector walking loop
Date: Sat, 13 May 2023 22:32:54 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109849-4-VjlB16FejA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109849-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109849-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109849

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Actually why didn't we copy the loop header in the first place?=