From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id C3B143858439; Tue, 16 May 2023 02:53:38 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C3B143858439 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1684205618; bh=9fgeTkjU8hvDJQgTPhWyrVlCDJzgBwwKGRdHwUGX6ZA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=o94C/AN7NFMZW126Izp2AdMhQf00XioLXif7ViOptmfSwreXscmQY0Ow7UxJeVWTq vteyKT/ZzJztGwu0gt5vaD3nTeeLYLK07LVazdKSIldwz9sCrgMQW47dREy5onAi18 sWZ/Lu2sE/BU6xz9otSk4SJK8RjfXStKSak7xK30= From: "crazylht at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/109858] [14 Regression] r14-172 caused some SPEC2017 bmk to degrade on Power Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 02:53:37 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, ra X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: crazylht at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109858 --- Comment #5 from Hongtao.liu --- (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #3) > (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #2) > > Does https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-May/617431.html hel= p? >=20 > Sorry, I just measured those degraded bmks with this fix, the results sho= wed > it didn't help. Sorry for the inconvience, could you try again with attached patch. The patch will still use GENERAL_REGS when hard_regno_mode_ok for mode and GENERAL_REGS(which is the case in PR109610), hope it can also fix this regression.=