From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 6B196385772B; Mon, 15 May 2023 20:41:50 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6B196385772B
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1684183310;
	bh=5p0N00F2SeB/X5ovJw/Rk8TEKWzDPUkH+MDZioWOyAI=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=iTHdfvSJFPy7axNfi8s28gbelBSd3DirHFVRn1osPBgAiOuz8gs7yVPaIqIPEdGXk
	 zzXOBm58hCJARCp1uppgm9Lb9uB6vJU/vKBgIw+0zzOFvK2ZcHrWmgoW4Eh2CwteZp
	 yM+q4KQmxW6mouQev/H+aD7e2xt7kAanYMeI1KkA=
From: "kargl at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/109865] different results when routine moved inside the
 contains statement
Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 20:41:50 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: og12 (devel/omp/gcc-12)
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109865-4-91imQkseEc@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109865-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109865-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109865

--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to GARY.WHITE@ColoState.edu from comment #5)
> (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #4)

> > I assume you've also tried with -fcheck=3Dall.
> > Your report states you're using og12.  If=20
> > it supports the sanitizer, can you add=20
> > -fsanitize=3Dundefined to the options?
>=20
> -fcheck=3Dall does not generate any warnings.
> -fsanitize=3Dundefined returns pages when loading of:
>=20
> undefined reference to `__ubsan_handle_pointer_overflow'
>=20
> which makes no sense to me????

Hmmm.  Thanks for checking.  Either your version of
gcc is not built with --enable-libsanitizer or=20
gfortran cannot find the library.  At this point,
it seems we're going to need a complete testcase.=