From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 5DCE53857004; Mon, 15 May 2023 20:32:47 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5DCE53857004
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1684182767;
	bh=WeHI1u4YtMvrKAl14PyoCOU6k3G/cJfQVznZKGswy0M=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=XfxjmzE/tRgHYUD7kKHpiBFSYs+kkQQwi9B4jhuu8mpnC4gut+A5YXICVWUyglFKO
	 ZcRV1uyXPYxlWxeqDgZfYDPGMR3RrMdN2J0RWd+i/M94kbcVWWeoqLxryDJOqHre3C
	 M44FZ1tKGVfhjPc6PhIw/wuy2t+D/3dUmRGBoCto=
From: "Gary.White at ColoState dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/109865] different results when routine moved inside the
 contains statement
Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 20:32:47 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: og12 (devel/omp/gcc-12)
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: Gary.White at ColoState dot edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109865-4-LOog9QWP94@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109865-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109865-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109865

--- Comment #5 from GARY.WHITE at ColoState dot edu <Gary.White at ColoStat=
e dot edu> ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #4)
> On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 07:11:17PM +0000, Gary.White at ColoState dot edu
> wrote:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109865
> > (In reply to kargl from comment #2)
> > > (In reply to GARY.WHITE@ColoState.edu from comment #0)
> > >=20
> > > > Options being used to compile the code:
> > > > 	COPTIONS =3D -cpp -std=3Df2018 -c -D ieee -D dbleprecision -m64
> > > > -fsignaling-nans -ffpe-summary=3D'invalid','zero','overflow','under=
flow' -O3
> > > > -funroll-loops -ffast-math=20
> > >=20
> > > What happens if you remove -ffast-math and use -O0 or -O1?
> >=20
> > -O0 generates correct code with or without -ffastmath, -O1 does not gen=
erate
> > correct code.
>=20
> I assume you've also tried with -fcheck=3Dall.
> Your report states you're using og12.  If=20
> it supports the sanitizer, can you add=20
> -fsanitize=3Dundefined to the options?

-fcheck=3Dall does not generate any warnings.
-fsanitize=3Dundefined returns pages when loading of:

undefined reference to `__ubsan_handle_pointer_overflow'

which makes no sense to me????=