From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 37CD7385843A; Tue, 16 May 2023 15:55:54 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 37CD7385843A
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1684252554;
	bh=XfHEXg1BDX09dxeyT8LgWW1JBXvedSFEoBl68oVCkAQ=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=uac6Vcrh79iUlJ8AtQJt2ZplLAaMsbfh93p6qH6nnEAyWxmZpkBBo0CEp1Lxmn9l2
	 S0xw5rfTWkrzL1r7oeNNZdpp46PTJUXLn50w4jnvq4LkkNPfANieYCYMsXtZDe2+VM
	 jDavhVWmPvj+9txvWEv0Ws/k+P5tyqrl1FoJ0ZJs=
From: "Gary.White at ColoState dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/109865] different results when routine moved inside the
 contains statement
Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 15:55:51 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: og12 (devel/omp/gcc-12)
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: Gary.White at ColoState dot edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109865-4-cKp06dIZ7Z@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109865-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109865-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109865

--- Comment #9 from GARY.WHITE at ColoState dot edu <Gary.White at ColoStat=
e dot edu> ---
Another clue.  I'm seeing the same bug in gfortran-13, except that I have to
use  -O0 for both cases of mc11ad.f90 in or out of the contains statement.

Similarly, if I put the set of va09ad.f90 routines in a module, I have to u=
se
-O0 to get correct answers.  -O3 causes a bug with va09ad.f90 in a module as
well.=