From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 257253857349; Tue, 16 May 2023 08:19:23 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 257253857349
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1684225163;
	bh=r0bGa9mC3m65POJosn/EIoi8tL3/snt/FHRNrKd9LQo=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=vsEjY+bXqH8Hyi5ka0nT6AmRsH0V4a+yBO4wxcRxP2MT7w8Yff358p0bh/FIlgdGg
	 J67VwqiwS0ukYoyE7MpbpkDvjgFGY86vkE5Kqbu1Jdkmq3ThQDaWlLFn+xgNMUwRl1
	 8QFazAgONAf0S4mgxBcuvEON3jYQXpZcQ7H2Akpo=
From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/109866] Sometimes using sub/test instead just
 test
Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 08:19:22 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109866-4-0KTkLDD5Ni@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109866-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109866-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109866

--- Comment #2 from Uro=C5=A1 Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
A small improvement would be:

        subl    %esi, %edi
        je      .L5
        testl   %edi, %edi
        jle     .L3
        jmp     h()
.L3:
        jmp     t()
.L5:
        jmp     g()

Not to mention the unoptimal handling of tail calls...=