From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id AE8AF385773B; Tue, 16 May 2023 00:13:34 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AE8AF385773B DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1684196014; bh=kdgy9EKKIaAGTnrlIg3w034F+rPzmZNT7ABN8Hr/TTk=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=O2nB8LZiTt/geajDEGX86K1uroZ81A+fJcfHFypy+jAstcxSVSwLV2uHGPEGNjsB/ Y+9BD/OzjPw/geeqA/ipcACWVs2lVjilxStwnCpJtJzp9G+fFacLts03lBM4SZxj1I peNsnPCs+AvaPr/0ecS58Vtz3EyCyJcO2uQ+0PnY= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/109868] [13/14 regression] ICE: segmentation fault or ICE in min_value with zero sized bitfield Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 00:13:34 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.2 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109868 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 55090 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D55090&action=3Dedit Patch which I came up with This patch adds back zero_sized_field_decl but keeps the call to is_empty_t= ype too.=