From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 39F2F3858D1E; Wed, 17 May 2023 01:18:42 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 39F2F3858D1E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1684286322; bh=urytUcUgEx3phowz8BTEnrWUAr242PLwv56ULsJLpHo=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=dyKxZF1zdP/GB/Rcr6BIFPe9t87/HyYrdpBV83d2SLl6zRH7IpHmcMBUk5T7RwC0+ dJeciYL51Zp0lCGjKNdNDJjOj9RLsr0LiGECAOANrX0lPCgjtf9tUzpw86iwocnHkX /V3EyidoQ6+KCcp39zwSq8/P3HMDcCgikz/V/Q1E= From: "bergner at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug testsuite/109880] [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p8.c fails after r14-916-g9417b30499ce09 Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 01:18:41 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: bergner at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: aagarwa at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone everconfirmed assigned_to cf_reconfirmed_on bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109880 Peter Bergner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|--- |14.0 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aagarwa at gcc dot = gnu.org Last reconfirmed| |2023-05-17 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Peter Bergner --- Confirmed. The difference I see is: gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p8.c: \\mrldicl\\M found 5 times FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p8.c scan-assembler-times \\mrldicl\\M 7 ...which makes sense, since the rldicl is used as a zero extend, so it does look like just an instruction count update is needed. Ajit, can you please confirm the 2 missing rldicl were removed because of z= ero extends? Bill's build seems pretty normal, so did you not see this failure during your testing?=