From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id B2D6F3858C41; Tue, 16 May 2023 23:45:10 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B2D6F3858C41
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1684280710;
	bh=0+LwQcc9sYnsAHQOqnI7lMUKRGqnIxI4y1JPk4COujg=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=lIdQWmLznNCimYXk9/OqkzS/fq/fAee8X5/MjrbQxjO0n2bi1EH6YkiQu3rlL7SEb
	 MaHzu2iShJlWhxwDvC3bcMe40qahImXEQIbMfb0AY6nfwn9a3WgfK+hRVCvBlfrHt5
	 BXjbscpKYze8TEWlsleqrcV+iJoXSaNR9x0EMtNc=
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug sanitizer/109882] -fsanitize=thread #include <memory>
 transitively includes sanitizer/common_interface_defs.h
Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 23:45:10 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-109882-4-Ox2i2NwYA7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109882-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109882-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109882

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2023-05-16
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The header is included since r13-2677-g0abc63a5ea4550 (and
r12-9342-g0cec4e9cd44e25 on the branch), and not including it would mean not
being able to annotate atomic<shared_ptr<T>>.

I agree with Andrew, this is a bug in libsanitizer. The correct way to use
__has_feature in a public header is to test with #ifdef __has_feature not to
define the fallback definition.=