From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 109C03858D39; Wed, 17 May 2023 08:28:19 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 109C03858D39
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1684312099;
	bh=9ygYYX6bjHLBk+Pw2Sj8dz4Bwf7CK8h5cyeJFSsaFJA=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=WstJg+9vsiCWb07lfy/FUBL5ma5FuBEHz8GEinfp+wrsDzOMgasKh6J1VVUw6vc5f
	 YuYcuOGI5vcIlLB1vqHz31nJEVFqKgcdeoKVILb/4UiXiiE6A5NIOwicHQtGcVvdWI
	 b/2Jibegrt5zcoSeqZvp6cyZL+Lz6M3WxFAz4TAE=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug sanitizer/109882] sanitizer/common_interface_defs.h bogusly
 defines __has_feature
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 08:28:18 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109882-4-xr7flzxy7w@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109882-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109882-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109882

--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Looks ok to me.  Now how to convince upstream to apply this? (Or we could k=
eep
it as LOCAL_PATCHES.)=