From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 5DA343858430; Thu, 18 May 2023 15:36:35 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5DA343858430 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1684424195; bh=MVD+b9h7GnaCS5IiOZT3Nk2dPwsAbe1YdiAol9+hQ0o=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=mvgG3z7u/M1EObSjI+wi4CaV6j2hz/oflbocAww7XCvyIqMY5OV+qRkuJqUJZzh0S 5KyEWGTd5AMBuycK51ABA2EaqQOFsOprmSXb6arrLAyZDMddF17azcRL+QanT78bOK lKfQyq+K52IqOJc4QOk6IGzwkXwC+BCH+kv/dlqY= From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/109891] Null pointer special handling in ostream's operator << for C-strings Date: Thu, 18 May 2023 15:36:35 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109891 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- Oops, if I'd typed PEDASSERT not PEDANTIC, it would be a deliberate choice = ;-) Yes, I think PEDASSERT fits better, based on the documented meaning of it (which even mentions the std::string((const char*)nullptr) case): https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/debug_mode_semantics.html=