From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 8AB9238E26D2; Thu,  6 Jun 2024 22:03:03 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8AB9238E26D2
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1717711383;
	bh=9bSFnOVa4kgJx1EHhmLmWr9NCgZrdiBLaplu9SX+2d0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=qVf0jsFZHUDEDmj8NNzouxjxTgzRUQlKi3oLsE58ryUCOrODXAxK3+1aT19GvXgfb
	 sgu8uhkzeWmWUUUU+eanY1TqsnXRV0VAsGn8TEeDUQxsMNEr+nOGws3FfyLwTQfiQv
	 SZbY0hOKj+kC1j7I9v0vUlyq9JiHrr2ux0eFyBJs=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/109896] Missed optimisation: overflow detection in
 multiplication instructions for operator new
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2024 22:03:03 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-109896-4-PfPXlZ1L4O@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109896-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109896-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109896

--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 58374
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D58374&action=3Dedit
Patch which I am testing=