From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 717633858C52; Fri, 19 May 2023 14:14:06 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 717633858C52
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1684505646;
	bh=vTcm+FKHKBnGxohgKf9+E3Jc1GdvXD/zlOIOEFhQHvM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=tJAkzrTKMOpSfaWQCYaC33vbhr6hjmEwTpl1t6qL8s1fIRTN1DN/uoBjhLie4OX7B
	 PTPLJosNs4NGbYqlxin5vzi2VYB8eifXJnOFE57dGiOp291o9+yhi/0g4z1ubbRw6E
	 4NbcsaMf+yMf80PW2fI/tYxUJqX3QW/fP0efjKgo=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/109907] [avr] Missed optimization for bit extraction
 (uses shift instead of single bit-test)
Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 14:14:06 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109907-4-dhhb3crCLn@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109907-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109907-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109907

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I was just touching that area in the middle end and had noticed it didn't do
any cost analysis....=