From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id F35623858C2C; Sat, 27 May 2023 05:52:00 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org F35623858C2C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1685166720;
	bh=kwK6mFfdpTTftWst6qR41tjbqTARMjV9AzMxMoFRUUw=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=o6/bWiRQ6G61OFcxnpCBZHDo7W+b/Dp5BkfMpSV105zUo7QzBzWT0UJCjQCdHcJ3F
	 VsJNfFK2y+jQX0VKc1p5fh5BhZhNFJv5Pv8chTF2PfbaM69lbVtQK9UwQPOcd8HC7r
	 p4svaehv5uW33OO/bNwmaFf8iBwxZC4k6wUS7HTc=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libobjc/109913] [14 regression] r14-976-g9907413a3a6aa3 causes
 more than 300 objc/objc++ failures
Date: Sat, 27 May 2023 05:52:00 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libobjc
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: link-failure
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-109913-4-QrmYphjbFA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109913-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109913-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109913

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
PowerPC64el looks fine
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2023-May/785580.html




powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu looks fine too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2023-May/785574.html

So closing as fixed.

Yes it was failing before:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2023-May/784854.html=