From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id E004D3857348; Fri, 26 May 2023 06:33:45 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E004D3857348
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1685082825;
	bh=Ss67Z/hNHd32cAVvJ4uQUTF6p7YAtwBSkNFBjrtNt1A=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=B7/eoYpnBour+6KEQTEqdUSrDk0dH75gFmjTCUGhszQUE3KJFVDob6gEUbh3JLVbg
	 cKKMdYrlAWEg41+ZRRvHqW96DpBkc5HV/FOJUlw9++BP2kaWjdYlk72Cxa0zn0LvT1
	 BaUzjx9OOEgCDAcGGJgssuPHhN5UpSlvtrJPe31w=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/109925] [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] Wrong
 code at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu since GCC-12
Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 06:33:45 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109925-4-j1muGK2AnE@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109925-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109925-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109925

--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
-fstack-reuse=3Dnone fixes this, the testcase looks similar to PR109967.=