From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 2568B385E450; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 16:50:17 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2568B385E450 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1711558217; bh=nZo1cQ+NzBNiM2FSckP6sM3oUf7HlRY21Un8RFb8ork=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=hOUkVZBIefxb1zZILlflwbBQ/QJ+gpyZxw72E3PFvT66Z/uy3I/5OhN78v+7RR9JG Ea6aLbYP0iZ0cgCtjEKb1XNFi7i2BbJ3pvNRdIZcxJy033vxGV0xYRk3NWdZGEtDeZ wvfoGlx9tRCW2ehUz5G23sAWZypjn/dvRqA3j70M= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/109925] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Wrong code at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu since GCC-12 Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 16:50:13 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109925 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Doesn't reproduce on the trunk since r14-4089-gd45ddc2c04e471d0dcee016b6edacc00b8341b16 Doesn't reproduce on 13 branch either, the PR113372 fixed it there. So, I think we should just add the testcase to the testsuite and remove 13/= 14 markers. Will handle that. PR113372 hasn't been backported to 12/11 yet.=