From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 19D983858D37; Mon, 22 May 2023 20:41:45 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 19D983858D37
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1684788105;
	bh=qp93XSBeSR1twK1HmCW8sb9NRjhJYg+jNcrJFKbjFwo=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=iTnX2+jCM7LPZxIju5Xm927GHHQMopBgLluUe0sciZo9rNuQl1CL/OULdheF4J4aR
	 DMbonYDjb521ZyXEgyqVTMQiByFHswljz/pBiVimRmMgQi7cW719avkkry13RRCGOe
	 Gi2PSVtdK0wdsUFzlHwC0odU2oGy82EZGsd+MZUo=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/109935] CTAD for an aggregate with a dependent base class
 doesn't work
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 20:41:45 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109935-4-CX99gRWImj@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109935-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109935-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109935

--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The same is true even with a depedent field rather than base:
```
template <typename T>
struct C  {
        B<T> b;
};
```=