From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 40A863858D37; Mon, 22 May 2023 20:04:39 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 40A863858D37 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1684785879; bh=8fG0DUZW85NtNHP/3V2BjcvVQqH2f4Xh2yB+huX8YAs=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=CgAp/AGh4q9EIQEYHwfy4Jqs14+enVWcXcPk9Nr9KTXSrw+YlBbjR9UyFPYM9I7fE kWxUbdhXv7fQ6YShaptZUMBlzD0wC/wP49IfHfnvrg0QyeUHe2pf+3sgy2MRSfYwDR UyA5b9cGR1olxMHsJrS+oFvr9MrH2CXmQB+nXbDw= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: =?UTF-8?B?W0J1ZyBjKysvMTA5OTM2XSBlcnJvcjogZXh0ZW5kZWQgY2hhcmFj?= =?UTF-8?B?dGVyIOKJoCBpcyBub3QgdmFsaWQgaW4gYW4gaWRlbnRpZmllcg==?= Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 20:04:39 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109936 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- clang rejects both: :2:3: error: unexpected character X(=F0=9F=A4=94) // emojis work ^~ :3:3: error: unexpected character X(=E2=89=A0) // this "not equal" does NOT work! ^ GCC does reject both with -pedantic (in GCC 12+) though: :2:3: error: extended character =F0=9F=A4=94 is not valid in an ide= ntifier 2 | X(=F0=9F=A4=94) // emojis work | ^ :3:3: error: extended character =E2=89=A0 is not valid in an identi= fier 3 | X(=E2=89=A0) // this "not equal" does NOT work! | ^ This changed from GCC 9 where GCC would accept both ...=