From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 2CD653858C5E; Tue, 23 May 2023 08:41:55 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2CD653858C5E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1684831315; bh=odkX2d/NkTNvfVGNNm44dUGmMAkODB669AaxVLeuHOQ=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=LGb+Y3QvJ3HfCvB63G++IVz2//vKE83imPBBaFcq457nADVodwBKNY8sIdG287njw VH8+NzaHKDB7K8CByOLyzOdzYYCPiU8xNFp5rROki+VS1lQ7xM7Kie8OreHKmdOM6g Ez3ISoON3HxBOibtNf8J6hW9ac2sVvGH2p16P0iI= From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/109940] [14 Regression] ICE in decide_candidate_validity, bisected Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 08:41:54 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: everconfirmed bug_status target_milestone cf_known_to_fail cf_known_to_work cf_reconfirmed_on short_desc cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109940 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Target Milestone|--- |14.0 Known to fail| |14.0 Known to work| |13.1.0 Last reconfirmed| |2023-05-23 Summary|ICE in |[14 Regression] ICE in |decide_candidate_validity, |decide_candidate_validity, |bisected |bisected CC| |ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Confirmed. A more cleaned up testcase: int a; int *b; void c (int *d) { *d =3D a; } int e(int d, int f) { if (d <=3D 1) return 1; int g =3D d / 2; for (int h =3D 0; h < g; h++) if (f =3D=3D (long int)b > b[h]) c(&b[h]); e(g, f); e(g, f); }=