From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 483503858C2B; Tue, 23 May 2023 12:39:59 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 483503858C2B
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1684845599;
	bh=IhqnxG0ynqkk+XFviC2458JFTtmsoy7eDzRSTfhKz2s=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=DMCHaz3nczlbGjiu2OXf8mywIAKyMsXkUXxGB3PPph5bfgFZ5JYGQgbse947CliaN
	 UrOq76xyVOnPPmt9WCXflsdKGZId9eI69gHca34H1Sg3xNErLrk20uTjknRf0O2CEv
	 t25SRojr4CQn19zwEJoDyKVHrOLktibVzvABEcdA=
From: "roi.jacobson1 at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/109941] [feat req] Add an option to mark STL types as
 nodiscard
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 12:39:59 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: roi.jacobson1 at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109941-4-0g4Ycd0VD2@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109941-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109941-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109941

--- Comment #2 from Roy Jacobson <roi.jacobson1 at gmail dot com> ---
Right, libc++ do that as well since 2019 -
https://reviews.llvm.org/D65900?id=3D213975.

Although with the RAII classes I think you need to [[nodiscard]] the
constructor which I think (?) is a compiler extension. And you're also much
less likely to have false positives with that so you can actually do that
unconditionally :)=