From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id B80833858D39; Wed, 24 May 2023 21:16:46 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B80833858D39
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1684963006;
	bh=QJcJgLhEiZLFEJ5+AoMVwQzpUyQMSilIrGougnItsh8=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=eOTE4tEbalfYKM6fPBsvN/pyETr8SPvnC7BpHOuSuzdMa6xeZAMmpyihrlbwHLSnT
	 H5Ae4pTsfu7CbjFQ2gWKJDwuvVPkV7nE+3CVFENldy16FJD9Da44jznM7n8puJZuy5
	 q62/s6VAL6T2Jv+jddjxrB4hNhQNy2Pk4eqSO53Q=
From: "aemseemann at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/109947] std::expected monadic operations do not
 support move-only error types yet
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 21:16:46 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: aemseemann at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-109947-4-ZAgqRNn7I2@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109947-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109947-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109947

Martin Seemann <aemseemann at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #5 from Martin Seemann <aemseemann at gmail dot com> ---
Thanks for the clarification! Now I am convinced that it is not a bug in
libstdc++ (although I still doubt that the side-effects were intended when =
the
committee formulated the "Effects" for monadic operations, but that's not
relevant here).

Marking as resolved and sorry for the noise.=