From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 9D9BE3857720; Fri, 26 May 2023 10:15:59 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9D9BE3857720 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1685096159; bh=6pW2St30inuRxGFZak1JQwe8yKc+cFTTUI5obAIrDWw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=pQIEA3EPJ1l8zW6askQA9Nx10053eaYWD1uHRd0qgORGypsQVYWNbWy6ymoic844j /NXIRPVimqdvjA6lsjgueypHYMpBVa6V6WUrW05XoMe5VmX+P+0OoCZHeMypK0y0Pn uewT9SB3O22gOIjqhdyYqL9vt80tczzOyC7k/LyQ= From: "pault at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/109948] [13/14 Regression] ICE(segfault) in gfc_expression_rank() from gfc_op_rank_conformable() Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 10:15:58 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pault at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.2 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109948 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- By the way, the patch regtests OK Do you want to do the honours or shall I? I think that this rates as an 'obvious' fix. Paul=