public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/109956] GCC reserves 9 bytes for struct s { int a; char b; char t[]; } x = {1, 2, 3};
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 07:53:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-109956-4-R8mDHV3y69@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-109956-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109956

--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #8)
> (In reply to joseph@codesourcery.com from comment #6)
> > For the standard, dynamically allocated case, you should only need to 
> > allocate enough memory to contain the initial part of the struct and the 
> > array members being accessed - not any padding after that array.  (There 
> > were wording problems before C99 TC2; see DR#282.)
> 
> I think the following testcase indicates that GCC assumes that tail padding
> is accessible:
> 
> struct S {
> 	int i;
> 	char c;
> 	char fam[];
> };
> 
> void f(struct S *p, struct S *q)
> {
> 	*p = *q;
> }
> 
> f:
>         movq    (%rsi), %rax
>         movq    %rax, (%rdi)
>         ret
> 
> Sorry for the tangential remark, but there seems to be a contradiction.

Not only accessible but also not used by sth else.  That is, a following
'char' variable may not be placed into the padding.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-05-25  7:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-24 16:09 [Bug c/109956] New: " pascal_cuoq at hotmail dot com
2023-05-24 16:20 ` [Bug c/109956] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-24 16:28 ` muecker at gwdg dot de
2023-05-24 18:30 ` pascal_cuoq at hotmail dot com
2023-05-24 19:18 ` muecker at gwdg dot de
2023-05-24 20:25 ` muecker at gwdg dot de
2023-05-24 21:50 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2023-05-24 21:55 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2023-05-25  5:23 ` amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-25  5:29 ` muecker at gwdg dot de
2023-05-25  5:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-25  7:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-05-25 16:42 ` muecker at gwdg dot de
2023-05-26 12:03 ` pascal_cuoq at hotmail dot com
2023-05-26 16:24 ` muecker at gwdg dot de
2023-08-08 14:57 ` muecker at gwdg dot de
2024-03-14 20:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-109956-4-R8mDHV3y69@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).