From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 256113858D28; Thu, 25 May 2023 03:39:52 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 256113858D28
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1684985992;
	bh=FDVlyR3Ozu8xMI3ldcjzxIeHQbvWHSec6bcfH0ktGJ8=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=cdhb+D+MA5TALdxYTqPEoSQPFWJDr89oo1PrCgHNCE2P3wJUvePTipmcY9zHM3x7P
	 a6G/bsRddXHVI3NEttRvBcCnCC9LluUYUH0kW08z019SKmWT7JDB2hdZZ7jWvd9gpf
	 5OBN5xOY9SEuLkcyKuZ4thIFDyCDTS3YkThBua00=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/109959] `(a > 1) ? 0 : (a == 1)` is not
 optimized when spelled out at -O2+
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 03:39:51 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109959-4-hXqd4cTMWn@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109959-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109959-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109959

--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Note the underlaying issue with VRP is similar to PR 109959 but it is about=
 a
slightly different optimization though.=