From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 45F4D3858D1E; Sun,  6 Aug 2023 21:12:53 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 45F4D3858D1E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1691356373;
	bh=Q7Y2oWLNVVY5+v6XMyo3wWfyiCz5Tk71NcCR1Mjm1Yg=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=fsRzCqYtvBLfOAjuqxfEfxFypHLAHvdeGEGrIGLH49KP0ZPgqxxMS3404Vogh5WxW
	 G1XNMZJLW2h3NFXELkRF1tzKuiHVUGuIkjJAezkHD908nrshdebDCpi8iEbps7MuYB
	 CN72iDlx9vfnoq3OsWb6PNiKIT4g8TvDIGWX/7+I=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/109959] `(a > 1) ? 0 : (a == 1)` is not
 optimized when spelled out at -O2+
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2023 21:12:53 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-109959-4-oTq2y9XDG6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109959-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109959-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109959

--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 55696
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D55696&action=3Dedit
Patch which I am testing=