From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id B6A013858CDA; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 12:59:32 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B6A013858CDA
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1695646772;
	bh=YtkBb+49LPqtbhptg9/uCEWQX93qyTmjJTZpIOOBiXs=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=UrvbxbBJ6Kon+LyxLVBSOFAP0o2hep/RB4fiBEdk6esEKDQnfw/s5zYNqntrcRDcv
	 P4wkQ6pt8tq36eNrwoUT4ut59NTTZGnIe/fnJwDRgS50vfvSUZFy8peKdcjKqZFs8J
	 9gqGVPUluMNDPMfYPK46Cqaib5t16rilpI1uuEoM=
From: "shaohua.li at inf dot ethz.ch" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/109967] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Wrong code at -O2
 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 12:59:31 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: shaohua.li at inf dot ethz.ch
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109967-4-E79ZXjTRK1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109967-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109967-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109967

--- Comment #7 from Shaohua Li <shaohua.li at inf dot ethz.ch> ---
This test case does not reproduce anymore on the current trunk. Maybe one of
the recent fixes fixed the underlying issue as well.=