From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 4D3D13858CDA; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 15:02:01 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4D3D13858CDA
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1695654121;
	bh=/QZ56nHvXsY4huE/QUCFawzkg1wGlDath+Gd+/FnXYo=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=PKT7V0Yte3xDcFDR/QXr9l51SanYg5/cPMTwnSGL5jSGuxroJWMHPKC/ma6NiHK+l
	 lJ9HGP9PWlU0fdTsTP7jS/xcLLIaYqKz9pqMnAfWGLKyx/59MoBE0ZfiX0R6f+V0sJ
	 50lZJniWud2owR1omrNBCoPlJIwOnOZlMGoP4fWI=
From: "xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/109967] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Wrong code at -O2
 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 15:02:01 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-109967-4-RuwnxW8qcO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109967-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109967-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109967

Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #8 from Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Shaohua Li from comment #7)
> This test case does not reproduce anymore on the current trunk. Maybe one=
 of
> the recent fixes fixed the underlying issue as well.

But we still need to ensure the fix backported into 11/12/13.  And there is
still a chance that the issue might be covered up by an unrelated change.=