From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id A56873858417; Thu,  8 Feb 2024 18:54:19 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A56873858417
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1707418459;
	bh=Yg9TxRuaHqWmc5gzw88unO3cZiQ8pVXP27qJ+R/M+1Q=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ALQ150Ea2j8sG21je7raV4IFpnw9BEoWjNVFw82PjC55FD2trpJuDRzAjkUaqTg5F
	 71JE6igTRptBPs08rv8PO8wWBoU3q3aTrkPVDuydLl3I68Q87uHd1lBE0nvOkS2HKF
	 IPCWTYpcplwwSqYGs0NFmRSQBfz5ddr5WXjs4Rs8=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/109967] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Wrong code at -O2
 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2024 18:54:18 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-109967-4-bjXjehGtv9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109967-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109967-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109967

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Plus we have the r14-7274 workaround on the trunk now, wouldn't that make t=
he
problem go away too?=