From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 561C53858D39; Tue,  1 Aug 2023 21:50:40 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 561C53858D39
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1690926640;
	bh=oIBvJTR9jpxmgZRd8N68Y36/b3OSW/t1tPNDcByj/xE=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=TOl4io2SG8yZCY413CA02320knpOPv0sS974LXs8wP90azyLrahWdvlIiQZYneOjz
	 0I/ybf9pLUbIsBXEWRhlUZjZlTAT8KCqpHydEkRjfFRZnDZLKqijhZTboqLRB3wOZ1
	 vBch3KAdgKxS3ftQBAhdqNhwflD0DF5puHvyD8oM=
From: "gabravier at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/109986] missing fold (~a | b) ^ a => ~(a & b)
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2023 21:50:39 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: easyhack, missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: gabravier at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-109986-4-ACN9KJgFAA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109986-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109986-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109986

Gabriel Ravier <gabravier at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |gabravier at gmail dot com

--- Comment #6 from Gabriel Ravier <gabravier at gmail dot com> ---
Seems to be fixed on trunk, except that I've noticed that the f0 example do=
es
some weird operations on BPF, but that seems like a separate issue.=