From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id DBDD13858408; Fri, 26 May 2023 21:35:48 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DBDD13858408
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1685136948;
	bh=srPxPYy8lAhKv+XHYBsawiBvmVQ02kPkvqKiOY2hmlc=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=LhQGzKK0SVhBSVMMsw2O51PjtTwuO9zbX+CkhJKHbcqRK4HmT/Z/wB0dOaxXIzAD/
	 wyB2fX9SwYQ/avReJvUQAKaSHtHnKKF+xaeFsih2cU4nVaYZ+0+P8nKs6SFvnN38aK
	 PYcs0Q3RPX/IGrR/W/KO9KgbxULKGxAPrD+rSyQY=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/109997] __is_assignable(int, IncompleteType) should be
 rejected
Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 21:35:48 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109997-4-EuCOAzOeGF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109997-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109997-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109997

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Isn't this a dup of bug 92067?

Sorry I mean is_constructible is recorded as PR 92067. I was reading some o=
ther
bug headline and getting confused.=