From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 469653858D20; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 18:25:15 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 469653858D20 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1712687115; bh=Be4x/M8pVyzSpmhF1GhzZ0iUQ2h2nAyNELqEPYLafns=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=r6fUw42TKAtW86kDMMej64gagU3cj/WgvKg4y38AmDbdJtHTLbenFD5BeDa0wEwXn nAy/Mv5POdsMMzWiEpQqCPvuWDlDMteRMaRMYptqK6lu+z2Jy/ZJzuc12JmGEdHNwO 0aRtccgTEjcTOD/keOD0drKeTYYLVqmCm/HX0IcE= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/110027] [11/12/13/14 regression] Stack objects with extended alignments (vectors etc) misaligned on detect_stack_use_after_return Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 18:25:11 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110027 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gn= u.org --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek --- Both of the posted patches are incorrect, this needs to be fixed in asan_emit_stack_protection, account for the different offsets[0] which happ= ens when a stack pointer guard is created. I'll deal with it tomorrow.=