From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id E80CD385E02C; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 18:52:10 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E80CD385E02C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1709923930; bh=Iys4pjDiFF1ptt9RSlBb7RcDEA7jPZrVEa17uSjIBhk=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=B0L20uFgNhaDISGsqVwaY6r66MWgBT2kp+dRSFloi64Stc5NWrY4ZDsQ0U9VKpNxm EGOkOzGHcgqTTAgKJ4adQ/1RQq8XesqX3tmqYGA3l7JoLKZ9eG5UpZec9hIkT6n8AN qmDurCeWobOXuRzUWLlWta80I+svMkjgCbbWyh+w= From: "sjames at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/110027] [11/12/13/14 regression] Misaligned vector store on detect_stack_use_after_return Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2024 18:52:09 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: sjames at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110027 --- Comment #11 from Sam James --- Calling it a 11..14 regression as we know 14 is bad and 7.5 is OK, but I ca= n't test 11/12 on an avx512 machine right now.=