From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id DD4513857C4F; Thu,  1 Jun 2023 09:37:40 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DD4513857C4F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1685612260;
	bh=RAjtD7wvxKsRHSHnYDcTHj7h9DCn+feyR4pP390JbjA=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=heqAXAKlKd5buDCDDe1WwIHNlvhjifHNz/gj1aOWHZ2m8U+laDDEbvBQkXhZk/u6A
	 ya9BKn6tva7lfKZD2HeRUNM0PtC8bSHy2vTrHEY4pY/0MACqTuMGE9K4PMUXINtWHc
	 j2D1e9ujQlC/xzIx5OWF0pPXuMajUSx8zP/eLSuk=
From: "yongxiangng at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/110057] Missed devirtualization opportunities
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2023 09:37:40 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: yongxiangng at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110057-4-bbRM5VcsAs@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110057-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110057-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110057

--- Comment #4 from Ng YongXiang <yongxiangng at gmail dot com> ---
Would anyone be able to direct me to which portion of the code is responsib=
le
for this threshold between len 2 & 3 array? Is this the responsibility of t=
he
c++ frontend? or is it still related to the optimizer.=