public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "d_vampile at 163 dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/110059] When SPEC is used to test the GCC (10.3.1), the test result of subitem 548 fluctuates abnormally.
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 12:14:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-110059-4-Yj2AsqbtM7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-110059-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110059

d_vampile <d_vampile at 163 dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|10.3.1                      |10.3.0
             Target|                            |aarch64
                URL|                            |https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
                   |                            |il/gcc-patches/2019-Septemb
                   |                            |er/530304.html

--- Comment #1 from d_vampile <d_vampile at 163 dot com> ---
When the SPEC is used to test the GCC (10.3.0) performance, the test result of
subitem 548 fluctuates abnormally. 
Trace the cause of the exception. I analyze that the commit(r276140) is faulty.
Revert this commit(r276140), and the fluctuation of spec 548 test results for
gcc 10.3.0 is significantly reduced. The following is the test result.

GCC 10.3.0 test result:

Benchmarks          copies   runtime   ratio
548.exchange2_r     128        553        607  
548.exchange2_r     128        512        654 
548.exchange2_r     128        513        654  
548.exchange2_r     128        553        607  
548.exchange2_r     128        553        607  
548.exchange2_r     128        514        652  
548.exchange2_r     128        515        652  
548.exchange2_r     128        553        607  
548.exchange2_r     128        553        607  
548.exchange2_r     128        508        660  

Test result after revert this commit:

Benchmarks          copies   runtime   ratio
548.exchange2_r     128        520        645  
548.exchange2_r     128        680        494  
548.exchange2_r     128        527        637  
548.exchange2_r     128        679        494  
548.exchange2_r     128        524        640  
548.exchange2_r     128        679        494  
548.exchange2_r     128        524        640  
548.exchange2_r     128        524        640  
548.exchange2_r     128        520        645  
548.exchange2_r     128        521        644

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-31 12:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-31 11:43 [Bug target/110059] New: " d_vampile at 163 dot com
2023-05-31 12:14 ` d_vampile at 163 dot com [this message]
2023-05-31 12:23 ` [Bug target/110059] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-31 13:42 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-31 13:54 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-02  7:30 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-05  1:41 ` d_vampile at 163 dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-110059-4-Yj2AsqbtM7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).