From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 9E2CF3858D20; Wed, 31 May 2023 14:04:00 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9E2CF3858D20
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1685541840;
	bh=5oLzNvvGrrAOvj3YN1NrjIRsTwL35kCCwK1V5mOMqPg=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=M8prsbYm10qJiNfJMTx+ZpJUYbR9KjnzLq944xlUZAUWPIKHWXgGEGr0JY3sUe5zz
	 eGrKNpSAwKm7ygGFMaER7sJNeufxtt1v4XMkREu2w0HGWJkOm2Iff00LMqSMmv6FGT
	 MZ7HeUhbMksFgxmNxsVi2NhDwm2JYn88RW44WDdk=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/110061] libatomic: 128-bit atomics should be lock-free
 on AArch64
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 14:04:00 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-110061-4-FXyvoYbJ4J@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110061-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110061-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110061

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Still a dup. Reopen the old one instead if you think gcc should be broken f=
or
loads.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 70814 ***=