From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 773433858C66; Fri,  2 Jun 2023 16:32:54 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 773433858C66
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1685723574;
	bh=5VfNcjcRyxyPE3s8WFxD2NiK5rUk+mOguXyD22JPI4E=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=kJdoeMeJTPh5YMwjtfm1tSubvziylQyFkZ/7lYC1Nzt2QxU8iSu0ekAwCT3Qttq1K
	 x3fdOLEDfxhgcrKH8kke1tNpqT+gOV/whHaGW1vPWs4itlOGRq+zOWnMm2Tnxf3o/Z
	 Q2gfOpDIBJTq8xWfioOzS/MDiAmatSC6g8qUlH0E=
From: "david.faust at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug debug/110073] [14 regression] btfout.cc format errors break
 bootstrap
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2023 16:32:54 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: debug
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: david.faust at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110073-4-xtAQpFsNoy@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110073-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110073-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110073

--- Comment #6 from David Faust <david.faust at oracle dot com> ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #5)
> (In reply to David Faust from comment #4)
> > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #3)
> > > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #2)
> > > > there seems to be a second fail on x86_64 darwin on line 970.
> > >=20
> > > I tried the alternate patch on a number of x86_64, i686 and power Dar=
win
> > > systems and bootstrap is restored.
> >=20
> > Thanks for confirming. I'll go ahead and send it to the list.
>=20
> I think with bootstrap fixes, you are allowed a bit more independence - i=
.e.
> can go ahead and apply - but now needs resolution with Alex's patch,

OK, thanks. And yes I just ran into the conflict. Rebasing now.=