From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id BC6933858D38; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 15:51:36 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BC6933858D38
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1706111496;
	bh=JQ42/Iwu9MxaWOKllYs3m1p9/L4BmjcZUnw2sU47oqs=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=mhKC4bm0zXqa7cCOD2o083Chm7tOeThnjGeQM002hyB5v8uSuXn4Fi2ecs1HCqpJx
	 dkgiqR8uxsa7bmPSvV4AaWkwCrsjY/21EXkUGy59a7zGPW4XvzRmKRtSMRtaXX4iZ/
	 mfUEJfkqtlTbxQdGbSeJJElKVsZ7sVUufq85mk1g=
From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/110075] Bogus -Wdangling-reference
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 15:51:35 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110075-4-is1S1e7ASr@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110075-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110075-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110075

--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yes, because we'd have to analyze the body of the function to see that it d=
oes
not return one of the parameters, which often we can't do.

There will be an attribute soon to suppress that warning.=